
Supreme Court's decision on term-time working holiday case due on Wednesday 20 July

Next week, the Supreme Court will hand down its judgment in the long-running case of Harpur Trust v Brazel.
15.07.2022
The issue in dispute is whether an employee engaged to work part of the year on permanent contracts is entitled to at least 5.6 weeks' statutory holiday, or if a pro-rated allowance to reflect the number of weeks they actually work.
Why this case matters
This decision will impact many employers, particularly those in the education sector, who engage lots of staff on term-time only contracts. Many have pro-rated their holiday entitlement to reflect the number of weeks they work each year (usually 39, compared to 46.5 weeks for a full-time employee) and, as the law currently, stands may have underpaid staff.
The decision of the Supreme Court should provide certainty.
We'll keep you posted.
Our newsletters
We publish monthly employment newsletters. If you'd like to be added to the mailing list, please let me know.
Our fixed price employment law service
We also have a fixed price employment law service. Please contact Gordon Rodham if you'd like to find out how we can help you avoid these sorts of problems with our fixed-fee annual retainer, or flexible discounted bank of hours service.
Key Contacts

Related Articles
Expert CommentEmployment law changes 2020: guide for schools and collegesHappy new year to all our readers.
Expert CommentHoliday pay: are your records up to scratch?On Monday 6 April, new rules come into force which require employers to keep records to demonstrate their staff have received the correct amount of holiday and been correctly paid for it.
Expert CommentDiscrimination: increases to injury to feelings awardsIndividuals who bring successful discrimination claims are entitled to be compensated for the upset and hurt they have suffered by way of an injury to feelings award. These awards are separate from, and in addition to, compensatory awards for financial loss which are uncapped.